Hello, Karl,
Sorry for piggy-backing off of this 4-year-old post.
I understand the concept of these "anchors" to jump to specific parts of a page, and I have been using them on my non-X3 sites for more than a decade. And I also understand the context in which Jakob is using this method to jump to specific "text" on a page.
My question here is, is it possible to also allow jumping to specific images on a page? I need to clarify exactly what I mean...
I am considering having a handful of folders (galleries) which consist solely of images, instead of having sub-folders that contain the groups of images. There would be many hundreds of images in those galleries.
I have created a test folder
HERE, in which for now I've just copied a bunch of images for testing-purposes, but none of which will be in the planned folders.
There are 4 groups of aircraft in that test folder, separated by the "seperator" images with the 2 neon arrows, and which are named accordingly so that they are at the beginning of each group.
If I use my browser's (Chrome's) search feature (Control-F), provided that I have caption-overlay enabled, I can search for specific images on the page, and that works quote well, and I'm happy with that :slight_smile:.
I doubt that I am able to search for images (as opposed to text) using anchors in X3, but thought I would ask anyway. As it's most-likely not possible, no need for you to waste your time explaining why it is not possible :upside_down:.
I had tried placing the element
<div id="mytarget"></div>
...in the description of the 1st divider image, hoping that X3 would find the anchor there when the link at the top of the page is clicked on from the
custom page content page, but as I expected it did not work.
I realize that I could just use the cuctom content page to divide the groups up, but with many hundreds of images it would quickly become unmanageable.
Again, I am very happy that the browser's search feature works great, but wanted to confirm whether using anchors to search for specific images on a page is definitely out of the question.
Thanks in advance.
John